What to make of all of this? Is the Communist Party
repressive and China
backward?
I'll share some insights that Chinese offered to me along
the way. You make up your own mind.
One PhD Research Chemist spent some time with me on a train
ride. I learned a lot from him. He had just finished school and begun working
when the Cultural Revolution came. No opportunities for work continued. Educated people were
killed or re-educated. Everyone fought among themselves. Bands of youth were
basically state-sanctioned gangs, the Red Guard. He just stayed at home and
tried to remain invisible.
After marriage, he lived in a small apartment with his
family, his brother's family, and his parents. He was able to get an apartment
for just his own family of four, but it was just 12 meters square (about 10 by
10 feet) with one room and a toilet. He lived there until the opening of China
in the 80's. Since then he has prospered very well. His children are both
studying in the US .
He and his wife live in a 1300 square foot apartment now. He is buying it on a
30 year mortgage, just like the US .
He is now in his sixties, and has a wealth of knowledge and perspective, which
he shared with me.
First, the opening of China
is total and complete. There are no boundaries. (Remember, I'm just transcribing his words.) Western consultants are used
for everything. Western knowledge is used everywhere. There are no government
or cultural limitations. The government itself is one of the larger users of
Western expertise. The government knows that the best way for the party to
remain in power is for the country to prosper, and it will do whatever is
necessary.
Next, China
is a country of central control politically, and needs to stay that way. The
history of China
is one of invasion by foreign forces. Centuries of domination by Mongols, by
Japanese, and by Western powers have left the Chinese with a firm belief in a
strong central government to protect the country. Ironically, when the US
complains about human rights issues, all it does is fan the flames that
foreigners are threatening China
and people rally to the support of the government. The US
needs to reduce complaints about China
in order to allow the party to reduce its control. The US
has no corresponding history of being invaded and occupied by a foreign power.
Think about the rallying to support the government and President after Pearl
Harbor or September 11. Now imagine that centuries of history are
of such invasion and occupation.
Combining the need for strong central government to protect
against invasion, the low education level, and the lack of history of
nonviolent competition between parties, it is not appropriate to think about
more than one party for China ,
at least at this time. And, my friend added, it isn't needed either. The
current party is a good one. It makes mostly correct decisions, and the
mistakes are okay. (For example, he believes that the Three Gorges Dam is a
mistake, and said that 85% of all scientists in China
also believe so).
He also talked about how hard the Chinese are willing to
work, to sacrifice to make life better for their children, and the importance
of education. Clearly as a PhD he is in a unique group that values education, but
again, I think about the children in the Tiger Leaping Gorge that live away
from their family all week, cooking their own meals and washing their own
clothes, just to get an education. And certainly it is true that in much of Southeast
Asia , the merchants are ethnic Chinese. The culture is one that
recognizes that hard work and education are how you get ahead.
What worries him? Two things. One is the growing difference
between the haves and have-nots. Many in the eastern cities are doing well, but
the western areas remain in poverty. The other worry is the growing debt. Tens
of billions of dollars are being poured into development projects. Not all of
them will be successful, but the debts will need to be paid. I think back to
the history of Latin America and Africa ,
where the development aid of the 70's just produced a yoke that halted further
development and increased poverty in later years as the interest on the debt
came due. In fact, I just heard last week about a city in Eastern Europe that
took out loans to grow after the fall of communism, and now cannot repay the
loans so municipal assets that have been around for hundreds of years, are
being auctioned off.
Other thoughts? One student once remarked that he and his
colleagues didn't think much of the communists. But again he didn't really look
to a change in one party rule.
We need to be careful in the West to not impose our values.
A kingdom works for Thailand .
One party is now working for China .
Democracy works for the US .
And be careful in judging. Many view the US
as barbaric since we still have capital punishment. We also spend more on
national defense than the next ten states combined --who is our threat? We are
the world's largest polluter, and backed out of the Kyoto
protocol. We won't sign the landmine treaty. Regardless of your views on these
issues, realize that to the rest of the world they seem very odd for a country
that professes freedom and human rights, and implores the developing world to not ruin the
rain forests.